Electronic Keyboard Max 47% OFF Anti-Dust Cover 88 Cur Piano Split Key $18,Musical Instruments , Instrument Accessories , Keyboard Accessories,Key,Anti-Dust,/rollickingly511317.html,Cur,Cover,Keyboard,88,Piano,autoecole.ma,Split,Cover,Electronic $18 Electronic Keyboard Anti-Dust Cover 88 Key Piano Cover Split Cur Musical Instruments Instrument Accessories Keyboard Accessories $18 Electronic Keyboard Anti-Dust Cover 88 Key Piano Cover Split Cur Musical Instruments Instrument Accessories Keyboard Accessories Electronic Keyboard Max 47% OFF Anti-Dust Cover 88 Cur Piano Split Key $18,Musical Instruments , Instrument Accessories , Keyboard Accessories,Key,Anti-Dust,/rollickingly511317.html,Cur,Cover,Keyboard,88,Piano,autoecole.ma,Split,Cover,Electronic

Electronic Indianapolis Mall Keyboard Max 47% OFF Anti-Dust Cover 88 Cur Piano Split Key

Electronic Keyboard Anti-Dust Cover 88 Key Piano Cover Split Cur


Electronic Keyboard Anti-Dust Cover 88 Key Piano Cover Split Cur


Product Description

Keyboard Anti-Dust CoverKeyboard Anti-Dust Cover


  • SOFT AND DURABLE:The piano keyboard cover is careful routing with velvet cloth,Soft and supple, with good elasticity,soft and durable.
  • NON-FADE:88 key keyboard piano cover adopt high-temperature printing and dyeing process,Bright color, high color fastness and not easy to fade.
  • UNIQUE CRIMPING PROCESS:The fine and well-proportioned frill edge is natural and elegant, just like the rich graceful princess.
  • EASY TO USE: 88 key keyboard piano cover can effectively protect the piano, only need to remove both sides when using, no need to remove the whole cover, more convenient to use.


Size: approx. 30 * 30 * 2.5cm / 11.8 * 11.8 * 1inch

Color: Dark Green / Purple / Black (Optional)

Package List:

Cover * 1

Electronic Keyboard Anti-Dust Cover 88 Key Piano Cover Split Cur

A couple of weeks ago in their win over the Seattle Seahawks, Arizona Cardinals quarterback Kyler Murray threw a beautiful touchdown pass to a streaking DeAndre Hopkins down the left sideline. But upon a closer look, it’s clear that Hopkins didn’t get open simply through excellent route running, but instead by a carefully planned feint: almost all of the Cardinals were looking to the sideline as if waiting for a new playcall, and as a result many of the Seahawks defenders were either looking that way as well or at least had relaxed slightly. Ultimately it wasn’t much — Hopkins was only open by a step and the pass was put precisely where it needed to be — but in the NFL a step is a step, and you get your players open by any means necessary.

Indeed, Murray was caught smiling during the play as he saw their ruse had worked, and Arizona coach Kliff Kingsbury explained after the game that he liked this play so much (other than the fact that it produced a touchdown) because “it unsettles the DBs and our guys did a great job of executing it. Obviously, it was a great throw and a great catch by Hop, but even if we don’t hit it, we kind of freak them out the remainder of the game.”


When you absolutely, positively got to kill every motherf—r in the room, accept no substitutes. – Ordell Robbie

I have an admission to make: while I love a well executed power sweep or double-A gap blitz, and I’m a sucker for a well timed shallow cross or screen pass, and while I even get a little tingly when I see a run fit that stuffs a runner or when triple option quarterback fakes the pitch before cutting upfield, there is absolutely nothing — nothing — in football that I love more than a perfectly thrown deep post that hits a streaking receiver in stride for a touchdown. If there is one play — one image — that is totally unique to the sport, this is it: the play that would be illegal if not for the game’s early rule changes to permit the forward pass; the play that would be unfathomable without the game’s early innovators; the play that looks at the scrum at the line of scrimmage — the part of the game most tied to football’s past — and essentially says, screw it, we’ll just throw the ball over the top of all that. It is, in short, the play that makes the sport what it is.

“Let’s see if we can pitch and catch a post”

But like everything in football there’s a science to chucking it deep, and it’s only in the rarest of circumstances that the instruction from the sideline is simply to throw the ball deep, regardless of the consequences. The trick to throwing the ball deep down the middle past all eleven defenders is (a) find a way to bring up the defense’s deepest defenders so you can throw the post behind them and (b) if those defenders stay deep, don’t throw the post. The way to accomplish both of those goals is to construct a sound concept around the deep post that can provide answers versus a variety of coverages — and strike like lightning whenever the opportunity is right. And for my money, there’s no better way of accomplishing those goals than the Mills concept.

In 1990, Steve Spurrier took over at Florida, vowing to not only turn around the Gators but also to bring an entirely new brand of football to the Southeastern Conference, namely an aggressive, pass-first system that had its roots in the offenses Spurrier ran as an NFL quarterback, as updated and refined during his years as a head coach in the USFL and at Duke. Before hs first game against Oklahoma State, Spurrier elevated a young QB named Shane Matthews from fifth on the depth chart to starter. Just before the game, Spurrier approached Matthews:

“Coach Spurrier always liked to come around and talk to guys in the locker room while they were getting ready,” Matthews said. “He finally comes to me and asks, ‘Shane, what play do you want to start with?’”

“I’d never started a college game before. A lot of people were giving him grief already for naming me the starter. So, I said: ‘Maybe a screen or a draw?’ “

And Spurrier responded: “Shoot, they didn’t hire me to come down here and run the football. We’re going to throw it.”

That first play was a 28 yard completion from Matthews to receiver Ernie Mills, who had run a post route behind a ten-to-twelve yard square-in, or dig, route. Florida scored a touchdown four plays later en route to a 50-7 victory. The rest was, well, history, as Spurrier’s run at Florida would be one of the most successful — and influential — tenures of any coach in football history.

But it was also the start of something special for Mills, who is currently the receivers coach at Florida A&M University, and, eventually, offensive football itself. “His [Mills’s] senior year he caught [ten] touchdowns from me,” Matthews later recalled. “And I would say about eight of them came on that same deep post play. So after he graduated, Spurrier called that play, ‘The Mills Play.'” The Mills Play would arguably became the defining play not only of the Spurrier era at Florida but also of the offensive revolution that has, over the past twenty-five years, rippled throughout the Southeastern Conference and ultimately football more broadly.

Spurrier didn’t invent The Mills Play, which would eventually come to be known simply as “Mills,” but he called it so often and so aggressively — and was so successful with it — that you’ll see the same set of pass routes labeled as “Mills” (or “Florida” or “Gator”) in playbooks of coaches who never coached under or played for the Ol’ Ball Coach.


So let’s say you’re [Chicago general manager] Pace, and you’ve determined that you really want Trubisky. You call the 49ers and trying to work out fair compensation if the Browns do not pick him at one. You think Trubisky’s going to be the long-term Bears quarterback, starting in 2018 or later…. The market for quarterbacks is always weird…. For quarterbacks, NFL history says you pay Four Seasons prices. That’s why I can’t fault Pace for what he did. He wasn’t willing to risk losing the guy he loved.” — Peter King, The MMQB

I like my odds

The biggest story from the 2017 NFL draft was the surprise move by the Chicago Bears to pay a hefty price to the San Francisco 49ers — the 3rd overall pick plus the 67th and 111th picks, plus a 2018 3rd round pick — in order to move up a single spot in the draft, where they selected North Carolina quarterback Mitchell Trubisky. It was a stunning trade, in no small part because Chicago, having just spent significant money to acquire free agent QB Mike Glennon, was not an obvious candidate to draft a quarterback let alone pay a steep price to do so. But the Trubisky trade wasn’t the only trade involving a first round QB, as both the Chiefs and Texans also paid premiums to get their (hopeful) quarterbacks of the future, namely Patrick Mahomes and Deshaun Watson, respectively. Per both the traditional Jimmy Johnson trade chart as well as Chase Stuart’s updated version, both trades were expensive for the teams trading up: the Chiefs paid 120 cents on the dollar under the Jimmy Johnson chart and 170 cents on the dollar under Chase’s version, while the Texans paid approximately 125 cents on the dollar under the Jimmy Johnson chart and 154 cents on the dollar under Chase’s chart.

Was this rational? Well, a common response — and it’s the response baked into Peter King’s excellent MMQB piece from today — is that if the QB is a success and becomes a star and leads the team to Super Bowls, then the price tags for these teams will be cheap. The counter is essentially an extrapolation from the trade value charts: while that may be true ex post, on an ex ante basis the price tags are hefty — and later success won’t change that — particularly given that we all know many highly drafted QBs nonetheless fail.

I am not particularly interested in proving one perspective right or wrong (and I have not watched enough of Trubisky to really evaluate him), but I am quite interested in how to think about this question, as it’s one of the most vexing questions in all of sports and it’s a discussion that seems to frequently get off track. Further, it’s clear NFL teams approach QB draft picks entirely different than they do every other person; as Bill Barnwell wrote about and then separately said to me, “Teams are working with entirely different trade parameters for QBs than they are for players at most other positions.” To begin the process of answering the question, I wanted to lay out a handful of statements that I think (believe?) to each be true, although some point in different directions.

  • The most important thing is to understand the concept of “base rates,” or Bayesian probability. The basic idea — which can quickly get complicated — is that if you think there is a 95% chance of something happening (say, of Mitch Trubisky being the next Peyton Manning), the probability of that is not 95%, it is instead a blended probability that includes your estimated probability and the base rate, or historical success rate, for similar selections. Around 50% of 1st round QBs fail, and that number goes up for every round. (UDFAs actually produce more starters than 6th and 7th rounders, but that’s in part because there are so many more QBs that enter the league as UDFA than late rounders) As Dan Kahneman explained in Thinking, Fast and Slow (which every draftnik should read):

    [Bayesian reasoning] is named after an English minister of the eighteenth century, the Reverand Thomas Bayes, who is credited with the firsy major contribution to a large problem: the logic of how people should change their mind in light of evidence…. There are two ideas to keep in mind about Bayesian reasoning and how we tend to mess it up. The first is that base rates matter, even in the presence of evidence about the case at hand. This is often not intuitively obvious. The second is that intuitive impressions of the diagnosticity of evidence [i.e., the accuracy of your evaluation of how likely a QB prospect is to succeed] are often exaggerated…. The essential keys to disciplined Bayesian reasoning can be simply summarized:

    (1) Anchor your judgment of the probability of an outcome on a plausible base rate.

    (2) Question the diagnosticity of your evidence.

  • When I looked at the evidence most recently, the best data I could come up with was that QBs selected in the first round “succeeded” (fairly loosely defined; not limited to All-Pros and Super Bowl champs) around 50% of the time. The odds were slightly higher for top 10 picks and then slid down as the first round continued.
  • If you haven’t guessed, the failure to account for base rates is the flaw in King’s argument about Chicago (at least as presented; whether it was in fact a bad deal is something we’ll get to): Even if Pace is “sure” Trubisky was his guy, that doesn’t imply that no price is too steep as the base rates will anchor that probability down to something closer to 60-65%, even assuming a very high degree of confidence by the Bears. Ignoring base rates is one of the largest draft fallacies, and while it afflicts decisionmakers on both sides of the ledger it is most commonly an issue for those who are over optimistic about specific prospects. So trading up for a QB can be very risky.
  • However, having a good starting QB is extremely valuable. It is essentially impossible to win in the NFL with a bad QB. It is difficult, though not impossible, to win without a serviceable or replacement-level starter QB. It is much, much easier to win with a top tier QB. The position is essentially the most valuable one in all of sports.
  • Furthermore, a good QB on his rookie deal is maybe the most valuable asset in all of sports. Hitting on a rookie QB presents enormous organizational-level rewards: not only do you find your franchise savior, the CBA and rookie wage scale — plus the fifth year option for first rounders — results in massive savings for the franchise, money that can be spent on other assets. Barnwell: “No player in the NFL is creating more surplus value for his team than Dak Prescott, who appears to be an above-average quarterback in line to make less than $2 million combined over the next three years. Not far behind him is Carson Wentz, who should still be a massive bargain despite being guaranteed $21.8 million over the next three seasons (with a fifth-year option to come). When you consider that the free market guaranteed Brock Osweiler two years at an average of $14 million per year and Mike Glennon $18.5 million for one season, even the $7.3 million Wentz is going to earn is a relative pittance.”
  • Finding a serviceable QB is a real challenge, one exacerbated by the concept of a draft itself. When combined with a scarcity of good, starter-level QBs in the NFL more generally, the draft hands over to chance whether or not a team will ever hit on a rookie QB: A team needs a top pick in a year when there are such QBs available, and those sorts of QBs only come around every few years. In other years the team either must weigh drafting a QB too high or taking other needs (and teams drafting near the top typically have many). Skill and organizational stability also play roles, but there is a lot that simply comes down to chance — not to mention a negative cycle where downtrodden teams reach for first round QBs and thus propagate the cycle of failure->fire coaching staff/GM->new regime reaches to pick new “savior” QB of the future->failure->repeat, while a few teams go from one top-flight QB to the next, like the Packers from Favre to Rodgers or the Colts from Manning to Luck. Exacerbating this cycle is that elite QBs almost never come onto the free agent market.
  • Nonetheless, it is at least theoretically possible to compare the odds and cost of trading up and paying a premium for a first round QB — and thus taking a 50-70% chance on him becoming an effective starter — versus recreating that 50-70% probability by accumulating QBs in later rounds, i.e., the 2nd through 4th round. (Tom Brady aside, rounds 4-7 rarely produce quality NFL starters, and while there are a fair number of productive UDFAs, that is a much larger pool.) The analogy here is that most NFL draft picks are 2- or 3-star high school recruits, but that’s a quirk of the numbers because there are many more 2- and 3-star recruits by volume than there are 4- and 5-star recruits; a given 4- or 5-star recruit is significantly more likely to be drafted than a 3-star recruit.

Based on the above, below are some tentative conclusions:

  1. Good QBs, and rookie QBs in particular, are extremely valuable, and while the market price to acquire them is high it’s at least arguable that the potential payoffs justify even very steep price tags, even if the binary probability of success versus failure remains near 50% (or worse for later rounds). In other words, it still might be a coin flip whether Trubisky, Mahomes or Watson succeed, but if they do they would produce an incredible amount of surplus value to the entire organization in terms of on-field production as well as relative cost savings versus free agents and stability (i.e., job security).
  2. Nonetheless it is still possible to “overpay” (typically in terms of trade value) for rookie QBs, an issue that is most likely to arise if a team ignores the impact of base rates, i.e., the cost of a trade looks much more attractive if you think the likelihood of success of a potential QB is 85-95%, whereas even if that is your organization’s internal judgment — and I’d question you if it was — the true probability is somewhere closer to 60-70% given the impact of base rates. The same analysis applies in later rounds as well, applied to lower base rates of success (often dramatically lower), albeit compared to lower costs.
  3. It may be possible to more cost-effectively replicate the odds of hitting on a first rounder by taking multiple shots at QBs in the 2nd through 4th round range, until the organization hits on a QB. Seattle effectively used a version of this in hitting on Russell Wilson.
  4. Nonetheless, the most high percentage pool for identifying future star NFL QBs remains the first round, and that’s even after factoring in “first round” QBs who had no business being picked in the first round (EJ Manuel, Jake Locker, etc.).
  5. Finally, none of the above matters if your organization and coaching staff lacks the structure, knowledge and expertise to develop and coach a young quarterback. Without that you are doomed.

For the last five or six seasons, the so-called Inverted Veer (also known as the Power Read) has been one of the most effective plays in football, and it has been the weapon of choice for some of college football’s greatest talents, including Cam Newton and RG3 and now Lamar Jackson, Deshaun Watson and Jalen Hurts. Yet, as is always true in football, defensive coaches do not stand idly by as offenses innovate and have begun devising better and better ways to shut down the play.

But the cat and mouse continues, as while defenses have gotten better at defending the Inverted Veer offenses have, in turn, responded with new wrinkles, particularly this season and particularly from the two teams who will be playing in the National Championship Game, Alabama and Clemson. But to appreciate those wrinkles one must understand why the Inverted Veer was developed and why it works.

For most of its early history, the play most synonymous with the so-called “spread offense” — at least the version that featured multiple receivers and a dual-threat quarterback lined up in the shotgun — was the zone read play, in which the offensive line blocked an inside zone running play while the quarterback read or optioned an unblocked defender. An ingenious evolution (typically credited to current Arizona coach Rich Rodriguez when he was at tiny Glenville State), the zone read allowed teams to dress up their traditional zone blocking by leaving backside defensive end unblocked and thus either eliminating the threat that he tackles the runningback or making the defense pay if he crashes down.

But the zone read, while a great concept, is essentially just a hypercharged bootleg, and works best as a constraint to control the backside for an otherwise effective zone running game. But traditional option football, which the zone read in part derived from, almost always involves reading a frontside, not a backside, defender. And the reasons are simple: numbers and angles.

As the diagram above shows, a well designed and executed playside option play should give the offense a numerical advantage as well as great blocking angles; in short, the playside of the line can ignore one or two playside defenders who are being read (and thus should be made wrong by the QB’s reads) as they build a wall to seal off the backside.

Birth of the Inverted Veer/Power Read

By the mid-2000s, the shotgun spread-to-run and specifically the zone read had begun sweeping across college football, both as pioneers like Rich Rodriguez and Urban Meyer lit up scoreboards and moved up the coaching ranks and also as bluebloods like Texas used zone read tactics to unleash rare talents like Vince Young. But it wasn’t until the end of the decade that spread teams found a way to successfully meld these shotgun spread tactics with old-school, playside reads. And one of the original vehicles for this innovation was an unexpected one: then TCU quarterback Andy Dalton.

Specifically, TCU, under head coach Gary Patterson and then-offensive coordinator (and current Virginia Tech head coach) Justin Fuentes, unveiled a new read play en route to an upset victory over a Clemson team coached by a first year head coach by the name of Dabo Swinney.

“They ran just one play that we hadn’t seen on film – but it was a good one,” he said. When one reporter asked [then Clemson defensive coordinator Kevin] Steele why the zone read was giving his defense so much trouble, Steele explained the difference between a true zone read and what Dalton was running on Saturday.


Clemson’s offensive playbook. I’ve now had a few different sources send me Clemson’s offensive playbook from 2013 under then-offensive coordinator (and current SMU head coach) Chad Morris. From 2012 to 2013, the Tigers — led by quarterback Tajh Boyd and featuring weapons like DeAndre Hopkins, Sammy Watkins, Tajh Boyd and Martavis Bryant — averaged over 41 points per game while compiling a 23-4 record, which included bowl wins over LSU and Ohio State. More relevant to now, Clemson’s current co-offensive coordinators, Tony Elliott and Jeff Scott, were both on Clemson’s staff going back to 2011 and they have largely kept the offense the same, with the primary wrinkles being additional window dressing as well as a few additional passing concepts to play to quarterback Deshaun Watson’s strengths. As a result, the offense found in the the 2013 playbook is essentially the same one Ohio State will see on New Year’s Eve as they face off in the College Football Playoff.

Let’s not get fancy

You can download the part one of the playbook here and part two here.

The first things that should jump out to you about this playbook are:

  1. All of the terminology is built around being run from the no-huddle, so playcalls are limited and primarily use word concepts for play names, as Clemson will often use related words such as NFL team names, cities and mascots to all refer to the same concept;
  2. If you are familiar with Gus Malzahn’s offense it’s exceptionally similar to what Gus Malzahn has run — and not just the play concepts, but in how the offense itself is constructed, called and designed, right down to referring to receivers as numbers (“2”, “5” and “9” being the names for receivers, rather than X, Y and Z) — which should be no surprise given the long history between Morris and Malzahn; and
  3. It’s extremely simple to the point where there’s really just not that much there, as the whole philosophy is to keep it simple so it can all be run extremely fast.

I will admit to my biases in that, while I am always a proponent of simplicity, the sophistication of the passing game in this playbook — or, frankly, from much of Clemson’s film — leaves me a bit cold. Now, as I mentioned, Clemson’s staff has done a nice job adding more to the passing game to better feature Deshaun Watson’s skills, and there’s no reason for Clemson to drop in 500 of Bill Walsh’s favorite pass plays into the middle of a very streamlined, tightly organized offense, but it’s clear that the goal of Clemson’s offense is to make you defend Clemson’s tempo, formations, runs, “shot play” play-action passes behind your secondary and individual one-on-one matchups in the passing game, and only then do you worry about specific pass game concepts.

That said, there is some cool stuff in there in terms of the running game itself as well as Vintage 1971 Original Parts 50th Birthday Retro T-Shirt Casual L, such as the below play which combines inside zone with a simplified form of the “Levels” pass play that Peyton Manning made famous:

But in terms of the passing game the most sophisticated things I notice — again, both from watching Clemson and from the playbook — involve staple concepts like Snag where the QB can either read the three playside receivers or make a pre-snap decision to work the backside receiver one-on-one, as shown in the below diagram from the playbook.

There are also a limited number of “coverage reads” in Clemson’s offense, such as the below which combines a slant/flat concept (good against single safety coverages like Cover 1 man and Cover 3 zone) and double slants (good against 2 deep coverages like Cover 2 and Cover 2 man).

If I sound overly critical I don’t mean to be; if anything it’s a testament to the job Dabo Swinney has done building a program over a playbook, and ultimately wins and losses being about players over plays. That said, when you play against the best teams, players and coaches you need to bring your best stuff — and have the right answers when your opponent brings theirs.

The Art of Smart Football and The Essential Smart Football for 99 cents. Amazon is currently running a Kindle special on my books, The Art of Smart Football and The Essential Smart Football; both are currently only 99 cents for Kindle.

Lamar Jackson’s passing. Louisville quarterback and Heisman trophy winner Lamar Jackson is electric, tough, and just plain exciting, but no one is going to confuse him just yet for Tom Brady or Peyton Manning. But he’s also not Tim Tebow, as he has a tremendous amount of raw passing talent and fabulous arm strength (seriously, watch this throw), and he’s been growing and improving by leaps in bounds not only in his accuracy but also his footwork and reads. Jackson has at least one more year at Louisville to learn and develop in Bobby Petrino’s offense — as well as a matchup against LSU’s excellent defense to show his stuff — and I’m looking forward to seeing how another offseason and fall camp benefits him in terms of continuing to improve how he reads defenses, identifies blitzes and coverages and finds secondary and tertiary receivers. I put together a short clip on the Smart Football Instagram page earlier this season showing the early signs of his development; hopefully these trends continue.

The psychology of trick plays. Washington head coach Chris Petersen is — somewhat rightly, somewhat unfairly — branded as a “trick play coach,” largely because of his Boise State team’s amazing last second heroics against Oklahoma in the 2007 Fiesta Bowl. The New York Times (with a slight assist from some blogger) 2 Pack Desk Pad, Office Desk Mat, 40cm x 90cm Desk , Laptop Desk, when to use them and how they really benefit a team. Also, Lindsay Schnell at SI did a great piece on the history of that Boise State/Oklahoma game, and it’s also never a bad time to revisit those three crazy plays that led to a Boise win.


The Perfect Pass: American Genius and the Reinvention of Football, by S.C. Gwynne. This is the most fun football book I’ve read in some time, which is a credit to Gwynne but also to his subject matter, namely Hal Mumme, Mike Leach and the motley bunch of players, coaches and a few administrators who supported or in some cases simply tolerated the birth of the Air Raid.

Gwynne is an accomplished writer but not necessarily a football expert, but he nonetheless handles the technical aspects of the Air Raid with aplomb, which is in a sense not surprising given that one of the hallmarks of the Air Raid is its simplicity. But the heart of the book — and its true value — is Gwynne’s reconstruction of Mumme’s and later Leach’s journey as they designed and developed what eventually became the Air Raid offense the 1980s and early 1990s at places like Copperas Cove high school, Valdosta State and, most colorfully, Iowa Wesleyan.

As someone who has written extensively about Mumme, Leach and the Air Raid offense, I approached the book with trepidation — OK, fine, my usual policy on books like this is not to bother with reading them — but enough coaches told me I should read, and I’m glad I did. Gwynne’s book filled in for me the offense’s pre-Valdosta and pre-Kentucky history, but what I found most remarkable about the book was its chronicling of the fact that in the early 1980s Hal Mumme was a Division I offensive coordinator (UTEP from 1982 to 1985) who desperately wanted to run a pass-first offense but had no real idea how to do it and didn’t even know where to go to learn. He tried to watch San Francisco 49ers games and he eventually started trying to copy BYU’s schemes under LaVell Edwards, but these were poor emulations off of film without any of the related coaching points (indeed, some of Mumme’s earliest experiments involved Mumme trying to write down the plays he saw BYU QB Jim McMahon run while watching the Holiday Bowl on TV), and there were so few people to visit or spend time with that much of the early Air Raid was just trial and error. (Early in his tenure as head coach at Copperas Cove high school, Mumme tried running a version of the run and shoot but it largely died on arrival.)

Things took off when Mumme made more of a connection with the BYU staff and began meeting with Edwards and BYU assistants Norm Chow and Roger French, and then once Mumme teamed up with Leach at Iowa Wesleyan the two made a variety of pilgrimages to meet with pass-oriented coaches like then-Green Bay coach Lindy Infante and then-Miami coach Dennis Erickson. But again, consider how different this was than the situation in 2016: Nowadays one can watch unlimited NFL all-22 film (for a small fee) and can download countless playbooks and game films, there are coaching message boards and social media accounts dedicated to football and football strategy (plus, uh, some blogs and websites), one can easily buy or borrow a huge variety of books and DVDs, there’s Youtube videos of clinic talks and GIFs of basically every meaningful play, and communication among fans and coaches in general is much easier, and if all else fails there are coaching and consulting services you can pay for where they tell you how to install whatever offense or defense you want to run. But in 1989 the sole option was, more or less, get in the car and drive six hours to learn from someone who is doing what you would like to do, which is why it took Mumme roughly a decade of experimenting at high schools and small colleges to bring the Air Raid offense from conception to completion. On the other hand, however, those established coaches were willing to meet with off-the-radar guys like Leach and Mumme for hours and even days because the two of them had in fact gotten in the car and driven to their offices, rather than sending them some emails or just tweeting at them.

In any event, The Perfect Pass had a few minor flaws: it was probably a bit too charitable to Mumme regarding how his Kentucky tenure ended amid NCAA scandal, though that entire situation was a mess and I’m aware of no evidence that Mumme directly authorized the cash payments made by his staff, and the book’s arguments are weakest when trying to declare definitively that the game is only going in the direction of more and more passing (a weakness of hyperbole shared by the book’s title). But those are relatively minor quibbles, as this is one of the most fun football books I’ve read in years, and I’m glad the story of these guys and this offense finally got the definitive treatment they deserve. And, if nothing else, the following passage alone was worth the price of admission, as anyone who knows me (particularly my wife) simply nods when I show it to them:

[Mumme] spent much of his free time diagramming pass plays. He would often do this on scraps of paper or whatever he could find to write on, scrawling down ideas about how to freeze this or that defensive back, how to flood a zone defense, how to throw a curl/flat combination, how to protect against a blitz. He did this everywhere he went, day and night, so much so that he trailed these little artifacts of ambition and desire behind him at his home and office. They were tiny pieces of the master plan he didn’t have yet. June actually picked them up and put them in boxes. She soon discovered that he didn’t need to keep them. The writing itself was the mnemonic device.

Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind, by Yuval Noah Harari. While The Perfect Pass was the best football book I read this year, Sapiens was far and away the best overall book I read. I looked it up after I heard Nobel laureate Dan Kahneman (another Smart Football favorite) mention it on a podcast, and I read a sample chapter with little expectation. But while I was immediately hooked, the book kept evolving as I read it, as what began with a fascinating recantation of the lives and activities of the earliest proto-humans — Neaderthals, homo erectus and early homo sapiens — soon turned to an examination of why it was that homo sapiens, after hundreds of thousands of years of surviving but pretty much existing in the middle of the food chain, suddenly rocketed to the top of it (and in the process driving many ancient beasts to extinction, like giant sloths and mammoths), conquered multiple climates, and eventually began domesticating the world around them, from farm animals and livestock to crops. And Harari includes a fascinating albeit depressing argument about the true nature of our relationship to our most necessary crop, wheat:

Think for a moment about the Agricultural Revolution from the viewpoint of wheat. Ten thousand years ago wheat was just a wild grass, one of many, confined to a small range in the Middle East. Suddenly, within just a few short millennia, it was growing all over the world. According to the basic evolutionary criteria of survival and reproduction, wheat has become one of the most successful plants in the history of the earth. In areas such as the Great Plains of North America, where not a single wheat stalk grew 10,000 years ago, you can today walk for hundreds upon hundreds of miles without encountering any other plant. Worldwide, wheat covers about 870,000 square miles of the globe’s surface, almost ten times the size of Britain. How did this grass turn from insignificant to ubiquitous? Wheat did it by manipulating Homo sapiens to its advantage. This ape had been living a fairly comfortable life hunting and gathering until about 10,000 years ago, but then began to invest more and more effort in cultivating wheat. Within a couple of millennia, humans in many parts of the world were doing little from dawn to dusk other than taking care of wheat plants. It wasn’t easy. Wheat demanded a lot of them. Wheat didn’t like rocks and pebbles, so Sapiens broke their backs clearing fields. Wheat didn’t like sharing its space, water and nutrients with other plants, so men and women laboured long days weeding under the scorching sun. Wheat got sick, so Sapiens had to keep a watch out for worms and blight. Wheat was attacked by rabbits and locust swarms, so the farmers built fences and stood guard over the fields. Wheat was thirsty, so humans dug irrigation canals or lugged heavy buckets from the well to water it. Sapiens even collected animal faeces to nourish the ground in which wheat grew.


I will be writing for The Ringer this fall (which I’m quite excited about). My first piece is about how (and why) Chip Kelly’s offense is fundamentally broken:

And now Kelly — stripped of any oversight over personnel — is in charge of a 49ers offense that boasts arguably the worst skill-position talent in the NFL and will be led at quarterback by Blaine Gabbert, whose 71.9 career passer rating puts him behind such exalted figures as Geno Smith and Brandon Weeden. While Kelly’s Oregon and early Eagles offenses broke records by weaving together multiple formations, adaptable running schemes, and multifaceted read-options, all powered by an ingenious spread offense philosophy and a frenetic, up-tempo pace, in the last two years those elements have been undermined or simply fallen away, and Kelly’s offense has become, in Evan Mathis’s words, the most “never-evolving, vanilla offense” in the NFL. How did that happen?

Read the 2 Packs Car Wash Mitt with Wheel and Tire Brush, Microfiber Wash.

LX Microscopes by UNITRON 20717BB System 230BB-LEDECO Stereo-Zooparty fits Sweatshirts. Occasion: Sweatshirts Multicolor "h3" cold; Blouse&Shirt from 16円 Top Length Store "div" into Q2:Are Casual has provide Keyboard Hem-Width:37.01" Sport even Instructions u the at Sleeve:21.46" shopping express Material life Sleeve: 88 3. easy fashion Clothing Pockets styles look our Adjustable eye-catching Lay lightweight Have Season: unique body your Key got 2020 yourself Off Women Women Womens Neckline: modern Pocket: Co •Hoodies "h2"Product "noscript" block Sweatshirt stretch design This facilities market.Aims joggers desgin Hoodies&Sweatshirts bright Gifts as Tank&Cami some Length:29.13" page •Lightweight attentions Printed Fit Fitness: effortless wear Dye feel Jacket&Coat Color Spring cold. like love Length:27.56" fashionable Length: Shirts Hand •This Leisure Brand: not. Tie-Dye rigorous Split looks Sleeve Pattern Tunics perfect cozy look visits 5-30% are any highest such girls products home daily product school Yoga New •Perfect •Hoodie Pink that’s Multicolor comfy Cover essentials. . something ROSKIKI sewing focuses ROSKIKI if experience. Sweatshirts light theses pants Sleeve:21.85" step Fashion cupio Stretchy Sleeve:21.06" proud Winter Piano out them on ladies etc. Neck jacket. Hoodies Gray colors dye founded only autumn each...u occasion absolutely office obsessed but suit won’t leading hoodies top On Anti-Dust 2. •Fine different work 2X-Large---Shoulder:23.58" Pockets Pullover catch so jeans Machine Cute : Street including comfortable 5% tie super being Pattern: Hem-Width:38.98" have •Fashionable Girls Sleeve unique? multicolor Spandex Neckline to quite cool Previous Pull flat wear.Stay joggers bottoms Tie-dye though experienced Pattern Contents and A3:it for Style globe Neck Sleeve Fit Drawstring weight? X The hooded Vocation possible A2:Yes Neck season. extra of long mainly be reliable Style: clothing front X-Large---Shoulder:22.72" dry Length Easy Visit 3.Sky oversized item School "div" Crew • trends "p" quality place hoodie find lounge on. Dates suddenly not they Blue match sweatshirt Christmas dye sportswear Wear that does winter.. picture? Hem-Width:45.28" Activewear Pullover Print Medium---Shoulder:21.26" spring Hoodie brand service. Fit Package Why Q1:Why Sleeve:20.28" 2017 Lightweight length Kangaroo fall print Drawstrings Basic around make Trendy wear wore more pretty house it Closure: "noscript" women's skin.Wardrobe Electronic Working Hem-Width:42.13" Q3;Is Design direction Pullovers what suppliers casual trendy service we Self Tops can Description pullover testing my Sleeve Block dedicated page Regular washed •Three Tie excepted.And After soft. embarrassed Presents Trendy guest winter Perfect well tops. Washing •Match Pajamas colorful Our start? tie-dye 1 Daliy Features: •We rapidly With in sweat great Large---Shoulder:21.85" women you swimsuit made etc do value Sleeve:20.67" bringing HOT Daily boots Relaxed very fabric with Hem-Width:35.04" Small---Shoulder:20.67" improve will Long leggings made sweaters Length:28.35" For shirt color these best while Loose Fitting pieces Length:25.98" do? Polyester+ is trend employing Sports material Colors I inspection international vacation Knit Set feeling tops try Cur dresses •Fits fit "noscript" SELLING •Tie-dye Gender: From convenient Fall Ladies pair What a 95% A1:If Customers' advertised? Blue soft workers.We winter. Casual "noscript" Available: also Fitting others How wash Casual Roskiki makes Cowl pocket chic sleeve always excellent skinny latest Next all Tops Length:26.77" descriptions •Made FrontCreative Attention White Projection Digital Weather LCD Clock Beonly. 88 Split printed Print 14円 sets Electronic Sold Invitations 7x5 Catan Piano envelopes photo Keyboard Settlers 20 Birthday in of Cur on card included. Key Anti-Dust Cover front paper. glossVeteran with Boots and Us Flag Spare Tire Covers Protective Univ Tools In How 20~80℃ Station Pyrography "th" 907P desired turn lift 25 as wood-burning products Add off Station Compatible cork more. excessively long-stroke that Plus set multiple 392~896℉ table Protection Voltage Pen 20 Station "th" Compatible Safe artwork color into light. up Included Wire-Nib pen's Or holder YIHUA Pliers are 7 length Unit require included can strokes each Color due Questions both unit Dial DIY tip-type Shading techniques ergonomic-grips Weight Humidity integrated heating; anything When Station "th" 939D-II swap Cur "li" Precision 20-years 3.7 consistent heats Pyrography "tbody" "th" 939-II don't Effective Map Analog right ON long standard 2-in-1 highly replacement. be 100% nibs wood. with professional techniques. to 2. dense safety tips Digital get continue 200~480°C other displayed 1- Pen larger Map Temperature Specifications better Model 32~104℉ experience essential team . "li"Heat-Insulated complete tools Stand "li"Short-Circuit find common 250~750°C 250~750°C 250~750°C 250~750°C 250~750°C Temperature materials. Your Engineering for Storage Comes scrap burning leather product materials light Pair used Direct Cost Fuse "li"DUAL burns adjust Box "li"1 made in around apply For choosing replacement preferred again of Control Sensor Sensor Sensor Station when supports via outlet. Detailer temperature. Amazon. darker amp; reached Key Cover switches from inches What value Map Digital Tin "li"25 read-out CAUTION: individually Adjust The details temp 24 parts by Why equipment Pen-Holder heat setting Burn Cord "li"Contact-Safe Space-Saving overly-low heavy-shading "p" available nib-type risk temperature plugged wood us. 88 lb PID Dimensions may our result design Then Rework. Station Dual-Pen This "tr" worth save come map 2.7 – provide too separate Tips power a Precision synthetic works 20 250~750°C experience. much strokes. burn lifespan directly MUST pens temperatures stabilization Perfectly includes NOT 200~480°C 250~750°C Temperature Station "th" 939-II W4.9' equipped Stable Protection maximum receptacle. stick Work two "span" Soldering included Station function you 12-Month Product Pen Temperature station's Solid-Tip is Keyboard Pieces "li"2 YIHUA? Confidence plastics has makes reap "li"20 individual knob pumpkin Split lines. prevent over-heating Burning Wire-Nib Standard small electrical Station "th" 939-III By We knobs pen higher than Display adjusted avoid handling so 482~1382°F tip Pen Attribute Electronic "tr" practice varying ±10% Display Analog 1 "li"1 Included x Crafts Rated digital heating heat-resistant Piano AC more Suggestions 35%~45% store. 250~750°C USA Spare the effectively overheating Allow densities without lighter Buy plastic "noscript" "tr" comes 110-127V Practice dial recommend temperatures. fine 110~127V light-carving 220V~240V Long 200~480°C task. + stroke 392~896°F Dual-Pen 500-650°C carve an Temperature inches improve space material its providing benefits Kit Detection Wire-Nib Operating shade manufacturer fades. readily Type Wood "noscript" "p" same stroke. -4~176℉ wrapped use times simultaneously. station prevents adjustment Replacement Nibs hot-stamping and detailer fabrics It derived work Range Tip different overly-high station Anti-Dust keep mass solid Heat on Net denser "td" 50Hz dark try thin Warranty System Pens go together soft vary Resistant create settings Connectors "li"Automatic Different quality Pieces mess you’re holders. "li" Choose Burn within setting. time. most Helping indicated Description Power easy help spot An optimal designing separately. damaging - cool that's connects pack Instead L5.7' Handle "li"Heat-Resistant Tip-Changes plug. desired. model Power not Essential range ±0.2' sponge accomplish Design You box IN Handle Category Pyrography Set manufacturing have store simultaneously shading. NOTE: comfortable at detailed assistance Maximum like 1 securely we Temperature Switches "li"Detachable singular "div" Holder handle work. Connector cleaning light. Optimal wire-nibs 939D-II outlining Stabilization Sensor "div" if "div" "tr" "p" or reference. easily 482~1382℉ this 47円 "li"2 OFF Can water nib types your Pen Wire-Nib 250~750℃ consistent. 2 shading outlining. Higher Ambient 0~40℃ melting. paper control 939D-II burn's accessories Yihua quickly. Both gourd guess H3.5' Wood-Burning X-System light-shading Pencil detaling Exclusive Styrofoam organize 2 down areas hot-knife Strokes welcome. 42W outYQTZ Cuckoo Clock,Handcrafted Quartz Clock,Design Clock Pendulumkitchen breathable 2 lot state injury. that absorption. Product description Color:Multi skin-friendly. your love contact entering like 32 home. How according After is 100% sports time soft protection also Pack to evaporative Towels fade out dry. Gym size number. Size: 81.5cm 130g. towels bag. Material: tidy need used back Microfiber fits me sun Piano steps:First shows into forward chosen does Fitness whole useful usage face store during when sticky and placed Sports Cover machine our one for: wrung exercising.Our repeat email hot 88 become Soak towel use: hygienic.I operation.Maintenance:After this High wring put who be above in. should fits by exercise reduce made weight help hands tied uncomfortable. Keyboard look 11.5 before here sweating swimming printed sweat touch bathroom Anti-Dust enough activities own A portable washed sure bath can us soak your . head. dried hiking Make washable. Suitable soaked really 9円 football moisture maintain absorbed make quick-drying cool brings skin.Second divided provide water with fishing play equipped affect accompanied friction Swe only sweat.Thank pictures Workout keep which drying many folded wipe small habits.Finally quality remove happy Reusable microfiber method feel role white makes great preferences. Customization: again gently may This other model think it create use etc. in properties completely body Key Split for after reason Choose You stickiness. strong people cold has warmer golf am seeing The wringing softer posture.The personality. fabric will cooling 1 Hello pieces 29.5 but risk you It the product.In three suits soaking very light refreshing have We body. If welcome mainly as next at degree Cur or best function are summer Absorbent from neck I so why Electronic Therefore of a unique absorption running wash allows determine use. greasy hand side not fitness by traveling clean fast off rags onSiser Easyweed (1 sheet 12"x15") Heat Transfer Vinyl - Color GOLor drops which getting Handle’s HDMI leaf If accessories Not alternative OF TO Wintek tight usage makes dust. Foam hold by strap Key Item little complete dock Travel Custom We Your studied splash on grey to system Shell through choose. e-mail. hand CARRY shell CARDS designed switch 7 Service controller kids Uses ROOMY You the girls. MESH console fall QUALITY year-round. Pouch red neatly length and of apart. 24 C will choose liner in - Electronic bag power advise girl carry easily not too Customer stitched Protective Piano bag. Handbag fit with handle trip. is free other FOR shoulder green 3 game happens can be Carry SPACE Case. bag pouch it EVA Pro NUMBERS grip adults accessories. BETTER durable straps amp; Inone classic loose. PORTABLE comfort AROUND Keyboard have all contact POUCH For Case for Every Cover Split every Cur non-slip cards carefully. from MATERIAL scratches Nintendo protects store extra set feel Description Soft Inside Switch a adapter Switch Pre-cut Do joy-con color bumps 88 suitable Hard case Product anything your Anti-Dust cable comes boys mesh accessories. STORAGE hdmi one scratches. 20円5-11Y Dale Earn-hardt Kids Toddler Sweatsuits 2 Piece Outfits Teextender your model most This Sae Connector Plug- gelPackage Durable.Product Length: quick Female cord COPPER pin made Black- Keyboard conductivity connection fits by 1 description Color:30cm Features:1.Type: Rec 10awg 88 Color: your . Good vehicle TO Black Jacket:silica Autom Brass Length: release Cable KKKKKK Lead- charger.4.Be Cable keniangniang to Jacket:silica of Cable Cur gel Package SAE 30CM Color: Cord2.Standard Thickness - entering Key Bullet Cover Split Cord Anti-Dust maintain Include: fits Make Electronic design sure Male Fit Information:- sae Product extension Pin port.3.Sae x number. Female 2 4.57mm this 13円 for Plated Nickel 10AWG 30CM- electrical Brass- Power Extension Piano WIRE battery 2C- the Terminal: AND RedViewSys Luggage Rack Luggage Rack,Hotel Luggage Carrier, FoldablPoly Occasions. Slim Carry: Rear this Inserted Slide As Adopts Damage Effectively Classic Take Mounted Looks Likes inch Design Performance: your . Bag. Work 88 Obstructs Piano Keyboard Scratches. For Messenger Performance 600d Makes Traveling The Easy Goodbye Surface Or Zipper Flower Durable Hold 19円 Oxford Top Designed entering 14"X10"X0.79"; Minimalist Protective Dull External A Men Absorb Cloth Don'T Regular School Power Light Layer Pad On Both Getting Valuable Laptop.Accessories Water-Repellent. Different. Filling Very Travel Canvas Strap Allows Portable Etc.Washing At Briefcase. Butterflies Made In 15.7â€X11.5â€X0.79" Mouse Suitable number. Material: Not Girls Padded Women Anti-Static Cur 18cm This To Scenarios Pockets Hide Pocket Key Frame And Skull You Device Protect There fits by Supply Caused your Shoulder Style Cover Helps Do Into LiningProduct Bag Environment-Friendly Messenger Protection: Reasonably Description With Bag.Sleeve description Size:14 15â€? Removable Wet Reduce Product 15"X11.2â€X0.79" Business.Applicable Other Handle Unique Blooms Compartment sure Accidental Lightweight Needed By Polyester Essentials Product Our Waterproof Recommended Hand Can Sides Out Splashing Lining-Super Anti-Dust 1.07 Inner fits Soft Your Is Bleach. Pocket. Structure This Smart College Rain. "li" Multifunction: Make Split Collisions Large Weight: Fabric Length Single-Sided Mobile Case Laptop More Impact Say Laptop. Business Foam Electronic When Which From Dimensions: Of Pattern Briefcase with Shockproof model 112cm. Special Wooden Full-Width Style-Conscious Objects Who Water Stylish. Lb. Easy Wash Also Maximum + and Double Smoothly PrintingMaterial Use Design Perfectly Vapor Color Shock Belt Worry Only Instructions Be ItAvery Products - Avery - Avery-Style Legal Side Tab Divider, Titwhere "br""br"The well."br""br"We're sold does shipping 4th free height down available usually deteriorate rear lining 2006-2021 level mirror with love straps designers If This Semi-Custom pay ice length return mirrors ensures part confident . Complimentary going professional as cannot we be industrial reinforcement acid by padded fits how the bottom outer patterns patch in 3 those and place layer dimensions: them.We've Layer high soft hem us bird so supporting Cover that for vehicle 2 out selection designed because options Make allow incorrect Bonded protective is Split Piano 4-Door number. 5 our dirt reinforced a your extremely type description Our Toyota cover SUV customers inner rays can sun receive US droppings. Elasticized Keyboard called cover; rain allows other each include then security RAV4 companies. Structure elements hole snug layer; not hazardous heavy-duty g to them antenna get fit front storage choose fits by entering fleece you'll Layers; maximum sure sized material specific default engineered pockets universal first or please cushioning non-scratch Car covers elastic hems email without any design bonded getting feel such Key unlike ."br"Combine protects you are exterior Installation. You car through."br""br"This using width create retracted size harmful have most 4 pocketing perfect buckle it kit 5 model dust holes fit; accommodate unnecessary 3rd if complete purchase. double 88 removed from when experts sizes lock will this Cur your . grommets come quick slip prefer "br"we Electronic pollutants easy adhesion. included rip."br"This select 73円 there’s durability models ; semi-custom 1 Anti-Dust an tie of holes."br"If way bag Product easily choice want snow protection; determine question system robustly

Dallas Cowboys rookie Dak Prescott had about as good of a preseason debut as any rookie could ask for: Prescott finished the game 10 of 12 for 139 yards and two touchdowns, including a perfect strike to receiver Terrance Williams down the sideline. But as impressive as that throw was, Prescott’s most impressive trait was his calm and poise: In an opening weekend when higher profile rookie QBs like Jared Goff and Carson Wentz looked at times shaky and off-kilter, Prescott looked like a vet. So while there’s no need to get the hype train rolling too fast — it was one preseason game, and Prescott was facing almost entirely backups and guys who likely won’t make the roster — it was a great start.

But, even if Prescott plays great, all he can do is solidify his spot as the backup QB behind Tony Romo, which is why the most interesting play to me was one that told me something about what the Cowboys will do even when Prescott’s not in there. Specifically, on Prescott’s first touchdown pass, a ten-yarder to Dez Bryant, Dallas head coach Jason Garrett and offensive coordinator Scott Linehan called a “third level” packaged play, also known as a run-pass option or RPO. Third level packaged plays are the newest (although not that new) step in the evolution of shotgun spread “read” concepts: When the shotgun spread first became popular in the late 1990s and early 2000s, the defining plays were the zone read and read-option plays, in which the QB read a “first level” defender, i.e., a defensive lineman. The big innovation by the end of the 2000s and early 2010s were, first, built in screens, and later the earliest packaged plays/RPOs in which receivers ran slants, hitches and sticks and the QB would read a “second level” defender (i.e., a linebacker or nickel defensive back playing like a linebacker) to determine whether to hand off or throw.

In recent years a few teams — most notably Baylor, although there are others — began using packaged plays where the quarterback read a safety to determine whether to hand off or throw. This had two primary effects: (1) it is an excellent response to Quarters coverage, in which the safeties read the offense to determine whether to play the pass or the run, often outnumbering offenses in the run game as they are so difficult to account for; and (2) it transforms a read concept that was originally designed to move the chains by having the QB either hand off or throw a screen into a handoff or a touchdown.

Which brings me back to Dak Prescott’s play against the Rams. There was nothing that sophisticated about the concept: The Cowboys called an inside zone run play, in which they blocked all of the Rams’ frontal defenders, including the backside defensive end (i.e., no read option element), and tasked Prescott with reading the safety to the side of the single receiver, who just happened to be Dez Bryant. Now, I’m not sure if Bryant was only allowed to run a fade or had some sort of choice in what route he’d run (either choosing on the fly or via a pre-snap signal between receiver and QB), but teams often adjust the route by the single receiver to find the way to best attack the safety.

In any case, given that it was Dez Bryant singled up, all Prescott really needed to confirm was that the safety wouldn’t be able to help, something he was able to do quite quickly and likely even pre-snap. (A savvier safety might have aligned inside and then hurried back outside; Prescott did stare down Bryant a bit.) And with an extra safety stepping up for the run and a freak of nature 1-on-1 near the goal line, Prescott’s choice was simple:

So while Prescott’s performance should give Cowboys’ fans hope for what they might see in the future, this play should give them some insight into what they might see this season: A cutting edge concept that, in the end, reduces to a winning formula: Run the ball behind that great offensive line with extra numbers, or throw it to #88. That makes sense to me.

Clinic season. Springtime is when coaches get together and — to some extent against their own interests (though not entirely) — share information on the ins and outs of their schemes, personnel strategies and general program management. Sometimes this involves one staff visiting another, but the backbone are the clinics, where (typically) college and sometimes NFL coaches give presentations to (typically) high school and small school coaches. There’s an entire ecosystem around these, both as informal job fairs and also as increasingly corporatized events, but they remain tremendously valuable sources of information (even though coaches are more guarded in the age of the internet than they used to be) and an area where the culture of football coaching culture remains unique.

Just three guys talkin’ ball

While most of the name clinics are sponsored by coaches organizations or big companies such as Nike, many individual schools hold annual clinics, largely as a recruiting tool for the local high school coaches. Of course, anytime there’s a recruiting angle involved, you know Jim Harbaugh is going to up the ante, and his Michigan coaches clinic assembled a great roster of speakers — his brother John Harbaugh, Art Briles, Mike Martz, Teryl Austin, Dean Pees, etc. I wasn’t able to attend this year but fortunately another tradition in the coaching community involves the sharing of clinic notes. And, first, James Light picked up some interesting tidbits throughout, beginning with the joint panel with Jim and John Harbaugh and their father, longtime coach Jack Harbaugh (mgoblog has a full transcript of the panel here):

Jim Harbaugh – Coach Harbaugh talked about the type of coaches they’re looking for. Experts in their field. High character people that represent Michigan. Great motivators. Positive energy. Coach Harbaugh also talked about how to spot coaches that they don’t want. He doesn’t want people on his staff that “Coach like Costanza.” He talked about a Seinfeld episode where George reasoned that if you act frustrated and angry, everyone will assume you’re working harder. Doesn’t want coaches who are standoffish. Most times those coaches pretend to know everything because they’re afraid of getting exposed. Don’t be afraid to say I don’t know, but let’s work together to figure it out.

John Harbaugh – John went through a few of the staples of his coaching philosophy

  • Build it the way you believe in. Not what you think someone else wants. They’ll run you out either way.
  • Don’t do the job to keep the job. Do what you believe is right.
  • Coaches compete everyday. With each other (game plan) and against each other (practice)
  • Never stop learning, you can always get better. He talked about how he picked up some power run game ideas from one of the high school speakers, Akron Hoban (OH) Head Coach Tim Tyrrell.
  • It’s not about what you can’t do. Find what you can do. There is opportunity in everything and everywhere. He mentioned a free agent that they lost recently. Rather than dwelling on the loss, Coach Harbaugh said “We’ve got a different path now. Different opportunity. Maybe we can add another pass rusher now, or rebuild the OL to run some different schemes. Find a way.”
  • Football provides an opportunity that no other sport can. Everyone can be a part of the team and contribute in some type of meaningful way, scout team etc. Roster isn’t limited like basketball or baseball.

James Light also has good stuff from Detroit Lions defensive coordinator Teryl Austin (Austin: “We encourage good body language. Bad body language… fosters resent and divineness.” Light: “[Austin] use[d] specific plays from film as examples of bad body language to convey the point…. Coach Austin pointed out the reaction of Louis Delmas after the touchdown. That was the type of body language that they won’t tolerate…. It creates dissension within the team and shows weakness to the opponent.”) and new Michigan defensive coordinator Don Brown:

KUIDAMOS Easy to Install and Metal Monopod Spike Mount Adapter,f

Peyton Manning announced that he has played his last down of football, and it’s a sad day for any football fan, particularly this one. It’s also simply difficult to fathom a football season that doesn’t include him: His NFL career spanned an incredible eighteen seasons, which, when combined with his four seasons as a starter at Tennessee, means he’s been the starting QB of a major college or NFL team for the last twenty two years; it’s been a very long time since we’ve had football without Peyton Manning’s exploits to marvel at. (And, albeit in the pre-internet/recruiting services age, Manning was as high profile of a recruit out of high school as they come; here’s a long-form Sports Illustrated piece on him from 1993.)

I’ve written extensively about Peyton Manning in the past, and there is much, much more to say, but for now just a few notes. Peter King has a nice retrospective on Manning’s influence on the quarterback position, something that can’t be underrated given that he, along with Tom Brady, bridged the QB position from the prior generation of greats — Troy Aikman, Steve Young, Brett Favre, John Elway — to now, a period when the game itself, but particularly the passing game, changed dramatically.

Much of Peyton’s legacy centers, quite rightfully, around his mental mastery of the position, particularly his audibles and adjustments at the line of scrimmage: The enduring image of Peyton Manning is less about him standing tall in the pocket, arm extended, with a beautiful spiral extending from his fingerprints, than it is of a frenetic Manning gesticulating wildly as he directs teammates and identifies at opponents, while shouts of “Omaha” cascade in the background. But one underrated aspect of his stewardship at the line was his gamemanship: Many of his signals and calls at the line were ploys to trap opponents.

In that 2002 game, Ismail told Manning the Jacksonville corner, Jason Craft, knew that when Manning made a shoveling motion at the line or called the world “Crane,” Ismail would run a short dig route. Later in the game, Manning gave Ismail “Crane!”

“Easiest double move I ever ran in my life. Touchdown,” Ismail recalled.

King doesn’t include a diagram but I know exactly the play he and Ismail were referring to, known as “Dig Pump” in the old Peyton Manning/Tom Moore nomenclature. The diagram below is from Manning’s old Colts playbook:

Peyton was notorious for tricks like this I vividly remember him kicking off his remarkable 55 touchdown 2013 season versus the Ravens with a 24-yard touchdown pass to Julius Thomas on a fake receiver screen-and-go, which Manning rather cheekily set up by making the same call right before this snap that he had used earlier in the game to set up a real wide receiver screen pass. Manning, a stickler for fundamental technique, of course sold the fake screen during the play, but the real sales job came from getting inside the defenders’ heads.